Home / Free IB Resources / IB English Individual Oral Guide
The Ultimate Guide to the IB English Individual Oral (IO)
1. Introduction to the IB English Individual Oral
The IB English Individual Oral (IO) is the internally assessed component of both Language & Literature and Literature, worth 30% of your final grade at SL and 20% at HL. (Older guides say 15% — that figure belongs to the pre-2021 course and is one of the most common errors students repeat.) This guide will walk you through every aspect of the IO, providing you with the tools and strategies you need to succeed.
What is the IB English Individual Oral (IO)?
The Individual Oral (IO) is a crucial component of the IB English Language & Literature course. It requires students to deliver a structured oral analysis of a literary work and a non-literary text or extract, comparing how each text presents a global issue.
Understanding the Requirements
The IO consists of two main parts:
- Presentation: A 10-minute structured oral analysis
- Discussion: A 5-minute follow-up discussion with your teacher
Your teacher conducts and marks the oral; the recording is then sent to the IB for external moderation. There is no examiner in the room. The task involves analyzing and comparing how two texts—one literary and one non-literary—explore a specific global issue. This format challenges students to demonstrate their analytical skills, critical thinking, and ability to draw meaningful connections between different types of texts.
Key Components of the IO
- Literary Text: An extract from a work of literature studied in the course
- Non-Literary Text: An extract from a non-literary text, which could be an article, speech, advertisement, or other form of media
- Global Issue: A theme or topic of global significance that connects both texts
- Comparative Analysis: An exploration of how both texts address the chosen global issue
Skills Required
- Critical analysis of texts
- Understanding of literary and non-literary features
- Ability to make connections between different types of texts
- Oral communication and presentation skills
- Engagement with global issues through literature and media
Mastering the IO requires careful preparation, insightful analysis, and effective communication. This guide will provide you with strategies and tips to excel in each aspect of the IO, from selecting your texts to delivering a compelling presentation.
2. The IO Format: What You Bring, What Happens
The IO answers one prescribed prompt, the same for every candidate worldwide:
Examine the ways in which the global issue of your choice is presented through the content and form of two of the texts that you have studied.
(Literature students see the same prompt with "works" in place of "texts".) Everything you prepare must serve that sentence — content and form, in both texts, in service of one global issue.
2.1 The 15 minutes
- 10 minutes: your uninterrupted oral. Your teacher does not prompt you.
- 5 minutes: follow-up questions from your teacher.
- The whole thing is recorded and a sample is sent to the IB for external moderation.
2.2 What you may take into the room
- Clean, unmarked copies of both extracts — no annotations, no highlighting.
- Each extract is a maximum of 40 lines.
- Up to 10 bullet points of notes. Not a script, not full sentences — and reading aloud from them costs you marks.
2.3 Which two texts, and the rule students forget
- Language & Literature: one literary work and one non-literary body of work.
- Literature: two literary works, one of which must be a work in translation.
- The work you use here cannot be reused in Paper 2, or in the HL Essay. Plan all three assessments together before you commit.
3. Selecting Your Two Texts
Choosing the right texts for your IB English Individual Oral (IO) is crucial. The texts you select will shape the depth and quality of your analysis. Here's a comprehensive guide to help you make informed choices:
1. Genuine Interest and Rich Content
First and foremost, choose texts that genuinely interest you. When you're passionate about the subject matter, it becomes easier to engage with the texts and delve deeper into their analysis.
- Look for texts that resonate with your personal interests, values, or experiences.
- Select texts that offer rich content for analysis—those that are thought-provoking and have layers of meaning to explore.
- Consider texts that challenge you intellectually and allow for nuanced interpretation.
Tip: Annotate a working copy heavily while you prepare — but the copies you carry into the room must be clean and unmarked, and each extract can be no more than 40 lines. Choose your 40 lines so they are dense with the features you plan to analyse.
2. Meaningful Connection to the Chosen Global Issue
Your chosen texts should connect meaningfully to the global issue you have selected for your IO.
- Look for texts that provide distinct perspectives on the issue, allowing you to explore different angles and viewpoints.
- Consider how the texts address the global issue and whether they offer unique insights or approaches.
- Choose texts that contribute to the broader conversation surrounding the issue and provide valuable context or analysis.
Tip: On a separate sheet or on the back of your annotations, jot down examples, evidence, and connections to the entire literary work and non-literary body of work. These connections are vital for a comprehensive understanding.
3. Complexity for In-Depth Exploration (Literary Text)
For the literary text, it's important to choose a work that is complex enough to allow for deep exploration.
- Look for texts with multiple layers of meaning, complex themes, well-developed characters, and intricate stylistic elements.
- Consider works that employ various literary devices and techniques, providing rich material for analysis.
- Choose a text that allows you to showcase your ability to engage critically with literature.
4. Informative and Engaging Non-Literary Text
When choosing a non-literary text, such as articles, speeches, or visual texts, prioritize informative and engaging material.
- Look for texts that provide relevant and reliable information about the chosen global issue.
- Select non-literary texts that offer a clear stance or insight into the issue, allowing you to analyze and evaluate its arguments or perspectives.
- Choose well-written, engaging, and thought-provoking material that encourages further discussion and exploration.
5. Complementary Texts for Comparison
Both the literary and non-literary texts should complement each other, enabling a nuanced discussion and comparison during your oral presentation.
- Consider how the texts relate to each other, whether they share similar themes, perspectives, or approaches.
- Look for interesting contrasts or parallels between the texts that you can explore in your analysis.
- Choose texts that allow you to highlight the similarities and differences between literary and non-literary forms of expression.
6. Manageability and Familiarity
While choosing complex and rich texts is important, also consider the practical aspects:
- Ensure you have enough time to thoroughly analyze and understand both texts.
- Choose texts that you can comfortably discuss within the 10-minute presentation time limit.
- For the literary text, select a work you've studied in depth during your course to leverage your existing knowledge.
Remember, the goal is to select texts that will allow you to demonstrate your analytical skills, make insightful connections, and provide a compelling discussion of the global issue. Take your time in this selection process, as it forms the foundation of your entire IO presentation.
4. Choosing and Framing Your Global Issue
Selecting an appropriate global issue is crucial for your IB English Individual Oral (IO). It forms the foundation of your analysis and comparison between the literary and non-literary texts.
A valid global issue meets three tests: it has significance on a wide scale, it is transnational, and its impact is felt in everyday local contexts. The IB also suggests five fields of inquiry to help you find one:
- Culture, identity and community
- Beliefs, values and education
- Politics, power and justice
- Art, creativity and the imagination
- Science, technology and the environment
These fields are a starting point, not a menu — you narrow one of them into a specific issue. Here's how to choose well:
1. Personal Resonance
Choose a topic that genuinely interests you and resonates with you personally. This personal connection will enhance your engagement with the issue and motivate you to delve deeper into your analysis.
- Reflect on issues that you feel passionate about or have a personal connection to.
- Consider topics that align with your academic interests or future career goals.
- Think about global issues that have impacted you or your community directly.
2. Contemporary Relevance
Focus on issues that have significant societal impact and wide-ranging implications in the present day.
- Look for issues that are currently being discussed in the media, academic circles, or international forums.
- Consider how the issue affects different parts of the world and various demographic groups.
- Think about the potential future impact of the issue and its long-term significance.
3. Availability of Resources
Ensure that there are ample resources available for in-depth exploration of your chosen global issue.
- Check for the availability of academic papers, books, and reputable articles on the topic.
- Look for diverse perspectives on the issue from different cultural, political, or social viewpoints.
- Consider whether there are enough resources to support a nuanced discussion of the issue in relation to both your literary and non-literary texts.
4. Diverse Perspectives
Select an issue that allows for analysis through various lenses, including literature, history, sociology, economics, and more.
- Choose a topic that can be approached from multiple angles, allowing for a rich and varied discussion.
- Consider how different disciplines might interpret or address the issue.
- Look for issues that have been explored in various forms of media and literature over time.
5. Connection to Texts
Opt for an issue that has clear links to the texts you are studying in your IB English course.
- Review the themes and topics covered in your coursework and identify global issues that align with these.
- Consider how your chosen literary and non-literary texts address or reflect the global issue.
- Look for issues that allow you to draw meaningful connections between your texts and broader societal concerns.
6. Scope and Specificity
Ensure that your chosen global issue is neither too broad nor too narrow.
- A very broad issue (e.g., "inequality") may be difficult to discuss in depth within the time constraints of the IO.
- A very narrow issue might limit your ability to make broader connections or find relevant resources.
- Aim for a balance – a specific aspect of a broader issue often works well (e.g., "The impact of social media on political polarization" rather than just "Social media").
7. Potential for Analysis
Choose an issue that allows for deep analysis and critical thinking.
- Look for issues with complexities and nuances that you can explore in your presentation.
- Consider issues that have evolved over time or have different implications in different contexts.
- Think about how the issue relates to broader themes in literature and society.
Examples of Suitable Global Issues
Here are some examples of global issues that could work well for an IO:
- The impact of technological advancement on personal privacy
- The role of media in shaping public opinion
- The effects of climate change on global migration patterns
- The influence of cultural imperialism on indigenous identities
- The challenges of maintaining individual identity in a globalized world
- The ethical implications of artificial intelligence in decision-making processes
Final Thoughts
Remember, the global issue you choose will be the lens through which you analyze both your literary and non-literary texts. It should allow you to demonstrate your critical thinking skills, your ability to make connections between texts and real-world issues, and your understanding of how language and literature reflect and shape our world.
Take your time in selecting your global issue. Discuss potential topics with your teachers and peers. Most importantly, choose an issue that you feel confident and excited to explore in depth. Your enthusiasm for the topic will shine through in your presentation and contribute to a more engaging and insightful IO. For worked examples of global issues framed at the right scale, alongside sample outlines, see our companion guide on IO global issues, structure and samples.
5. How to Structure Your 10-Minute Oral
A well-structured Individual Oral is crucial for effectively conveying your analysis and comparisons. Here's a comprehensive guide on how to organize your 10-minute presentation:
1. Introduction: Setting the Stage (1-2 minutes)
Your introduction sets the tone for your entire presentation. It should:
- Define the global issue: Clearly articulate the global issue you've chosen, ensuring it's both relevant and compelling.
- Introduce the texts: Mention the titles and authors of both the literary and non-literary texts you'll be analyzing.
- Explain the connection: Briefly explain how these texts relate to your chosen global issue.
- Present your thesis: Clearly state your main argument or perspective that will guide your analysis.
Example: For a Language & Literature IO on the normalisation of surveillance, pairing an extract from George Orwell's 1984 (literary) with an extract from a body of contemporary technology journalism (non-literary), you might open with:
Orwell imagined a telescreen that watched from the wall; today the screen is in our pockets and we carry it willingly. My global issue is the normalisation of surveillance — how being watched shifts from something imposed to something accepted. I will examine how Orwell's narration in this extract constructs surveillance as inescapable dread, how the reporting in my non-literary extract frames the same condition as an unremarkable feature of modern life, and what that contrast reveals about how quickly a society can be taught not to notice.
Check your pairing is valid
A Language & Literature IO requires one literary work and one non-literary body of work — two novels would be invalid, however well they compare. Literature students pair two literary works instead, one of which must be a work originally written in another language (a work in translation). Confirm your pairing with your teacher before you invest weeks in it.
2. Analyzing the Literary Text (3-4 minutes)
This section forms the core of your analysis of the literary work. Use the PEE (Point, Evidence, Explanation) structure:
- Point: Make a clear statement about how the text relates to the global issue.
- Evidence: Provide a relevant quote or specific example from the text.
- Explanation: Analyze how this evidence illustrates your point and relates to the global issue.
Remember to:
- Discuss literary techniques employed by the author (e.g., symbolism, imagery, narrative perspective).
- Explain how these techniques contribute to the text's exploration of the global issue.
- Make connections to the broader themes and context of the entire work.
Linking Your Text to a Wider Body of Work
To elevate your analysis:
- Identify other works by the same author or within the same literary movement that explore similar themes.
- Draw parallels to other texts in the same genre or time period.
- Discuss how these connections contribute to a broader understanding of the global issue.
3. Analyzing the Non-Literary Text (3-4 minutes)
Apply a similar approach to the non-literary text, but focus on its unique features:
- Analyze visual elements, rhetorical strategies, or data presentation, depending on the type of non-literary text.
- Discuss how these elements contribute to the text's engagement with the global issue.
- Compare and contrast the approach of the non-literary text with that of the literary text.
Linking Your Non-Literary Text to a Wider Body of Work
To deepen your analysis:
- Connect your non-literary text to other works by the same author or within the same medium.
- Discuss how the text fits into broader societal or cultural conversations about the global issue.
- If applicable, explore how the non-literary text interacts with or responds to literary treatments of the same issue.
4. Reinforcing Connections to the Global Issue (1-2 minutes)
This section ties your analysis together:
- Summarize the key points from your analysis of both texts.
- Explicitly link these points back to your global issue.
- Discuss how the two texts, when considered together, enhance our understanding of the global issue.
- Highlight any significant similarities or differences in how the texts approach the issue.
5. Conclusion: Summarizing and Closing (1 minute)
End your presentation strongly:
- Restate your thesis, emphasizing how your analysis has supported it.
- Briefly recap the main connections you've drawn between the texts and the global issue.
- Offer a final thought on the significance of your analysis, perhaps suggesting broader implications or a call to action.
Example conclusion: "Read together, Orwell's fiction and this reporting show the same condition from opposite ends: one dramatises surveillance as terror, the other records it as routine. That gap — between how we imagine being watched and how we actually live with it — is where my global issue really sits, and it is why a novel written in 1949 still explains something our own reporting cannot quite say out loud."
Tips for Effective Delivery
- Practice your timing to ensure you can cover all sections within the 10-minute limit.
- Use clear transitions between sections to maintain a logical flow.
- Maintain eye contact and use appropriate gestures to engage your audience.
- Speak clearly and at a measured pace, allowing time for your points to be absorbed.
- Rehearse against a timer. You may bring up to 10 bullet points of notes, but reading a script aloud is penalised — practise until the bullets are enough.
Remember, while this structure provides a solid framework, the key to a successful IO lies in the depth of your analysis and the originality of your insights. Use this structure as a guide, but don't be afraid to adapt it to best showcase your unique perspective on the texts and the global issue.
6. The IO Rubric: Four Criteria, Out of 40
The Individual Oral is marked out of 40 marks across four criteria, each worth 10 marks, and the rubric is identical for SL and HL. (Older guides list Focus and Organization and Language at 5 marks each for a total of 30 — those are the Paper 2 weightings, not the IO's.) Your teacher marks against these descriptors and the IB moderates the recording.
Criterion A: Knowledge, Understanding and Interpretation (10 marks)
How well you understand the content and meaning of both extracts, the wider works they come from, and the global issue itself.
| Marks | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Excellent: Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the global issue, and how it is explored in the chosen extracts and the wider works. |
| 7-8 | Good: Demonstrates a good understanding of the global issue and its exploration in the extracts and wider works. |
| 5-6 | Satisfactory: Shows a reasonable understanding of the global issue and its exploration in the extracts and wider works. |
| 3-4 | Limited: Shows a limited understanding of the global issue and its exploration in the extracts and wider works. |
| 1-2 | Minimal: Shows very little understanding of the global issue and its exploration in the extracts and wider works. |
| 0 | The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors. |
Criterion B: Analysis and Evaluation (10 marks)
How well you analyse and evaluate the authorial choices — the literary and non-literary features — through which each text presents the global issue.
| Marks | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Excellent: Offers insightful and convincing analysis and evaluation of how the global issue is presented in the extracts and the wider works. Supports this analysis with well-chosen examples. |
| 7-8 | Good: Offers a good analysis and evaluation of how the global issue is presented in the extracts and the wider works, supported by relevant examples. |
| 5-6 | Satisfactory: Offers a reasonable analysis and evaluation of how the global issue is presented in the extracts and the wider works, with some support from examples. |
| 3-4 | Limited: Offers a limited analysis and evaluation of how the global issue is presented in the extracts and the wider works, with insufficient support from examples. |
| 1-2 | Minimal: Offers very little analysis and evaluation of how the global issue is presented in the extracts and the wider works, with little to no support from examples. |
| 0 | The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors. |
Criterion C: Focus and Organization (10 marks)
How consistently the oral stays on the global issue, how logically it is structured, and how evenly it balances the two texts.
| Marks | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Excellent: The oral is focused on the global issue throughout and is very well structured; ideas are developed coherently and the two texts are balanced. |
| 7-8 | Good: The oral is mostly focused and well structured; ideas are developed clearly, with generally balanced treatment of both texts. |
| 5-6 | Satisfactory: The oral has an adequate structure and is generally focused, though the balance between texts or the development of ideas is uneven. |
| 3-4 | Limited: The oral lacks clear structure or drifts from the global issue; one text dominates or ideas are not developed. |
| 1-2 | Minimal: The oral is poorly structured and largely unfocused; connections to the global issue are unclear. |
| 0 | The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors. |
Criterion D: Language (10 marks)
How clear, accurate and appropriately academic your spoken English is throughout.
| Marks | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 9-10 | Excellent: Language is very clear, varied and precise; register, style and academic vocabulary are consistently effective for the task. |
| 7-8 | Good: Language is clear and effective; register and style are appropriate, with occasional lapses. |
| 5-6 | Satisfactory: Language is generally clear and appropriate, with errors or inconsistencies in register and style that do not obscure meaning. |
| 3-4 | Limited: Language is often unclear, with frequent errors and inconsistent register. |
| 1-2 | Minimal: Language is unclear throughout, with significant errors and inappropriate register. |
| 0 | The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors. |
Where the marks are actually won
Criteria A and B are worth 20 marks between them and both explicitly reward reference to the wider work, not just the 40-line extract. Students who analyse only the extract cap themselves in the middle bands however good the analysis is. Criterion C rewards balance — running long on the literary text and rushing the non-literary one is the single most common structural failure.
7. The 5-Minute Discussion: What Your Teacher Will Ask
The discussion is the half of the IO students prepare least and lose most marks on. It is not a new task — it is your teacher giving you the chance to reach bands you did not quite reach in the oral. Questions almost always fall into four families:
- Widening: "How does the rest of the work develop this issue?" — asked when you stayed inside the extract. Prepare two or three moments from each wider work in advance.
- Deepening: "Why do you think the author made that choice?" — asked when you identified a technique but stopped short of its effect.
- Challenging: "Could the text be read the other way?" — an invitation, not a trap. Concede the alternative reading, then explain why yours holds.
- Connecting: "What does the comparison between your two texts finally show?" — the question that rescues a lopsided oral.
The one habit that raises this score
Answer in three moves: a direct answer, one specific piece of evidence, then a link back to the global issue. Students who ramble sound less confident than students who stop after thirty focused seconds — and the examiner moderating the recording hears the difference.
Ten more practical tips for the day itself are in our companion guide, 10 tips to ace your Individual Oral.
8. IB English IO: Frequently Asked Questions
How long is the IB English Individual Oral?
The IO lasts 15 minutes: a 10-minute uninterrupted oral followed by 5 minutes of questions from your teacher. The whole session is recorded and a sample is sent to the IB for external moderation.
How much is the IO worth?
The Individual Oral is worth 30% of your final grade at Standard Level and 20% at Higher Level, in both Language & Literature and Literature. The figure of 15% appears in many older guides but belongs to the pre-2021 course.
How is the IO marked and out of how many marks?
The IO is marked out of 40 across four criteria, each worth 10 marks: Knowledge, Understanding and Interpretation; Analysis and Evaluation; Focus and Organization; and Language. Your teacher marks it and the IB moderates.
What can I bring into the IO room?
Clean, unmarked copies of your two extracts (each a maximum of 40 lines) and up to 10 bullet points of notes. You may not bring a full script, and reading aloud from your notes is penalised.
Which two texts do I use for the IO?
Language & Literature students use one literary work and one non-literary body of work. Literature students use two literary works, one of which must be a work in translation. Two novels are not a valid pairing for Language & Literature.
Can I use my IO work again in Paper 2 or the HL Essay?
No. A work used for the Individual Oral cannot be reused for Paper 2 or, at Higher Level, for the HL Essay. Plan which works cover which assessment before you start preparing any of them.
What makes a valid global issue for the IO?
It must have significance on a wide scale, be transnational, and have an impact felt in everyday local contexts. The IB suggests five fields of inquiry as starting points, but you must narrow one into something specific — 'the impact of social media on political polarisation' works; 'inequality' is too broad to analyse in 10 minutes.
Who assesses my Individual Oral — my teacher or an IB examiner?
Your own teacher conducts the oral and awards the marks. There is no examiner in the room. The recording is then externally moderated by the IB, which can adjust your school's marks up or down.
English is our flagship subject
Our IB English tutors rehearse the IO with students end to end — pairing texts, framing the global issue, timing the oral and running mock discussions with recorded feedback. 94% of our students score Level 6–7. The first lesson is free.
Book a free trial lesson Meet our English tutors ← All free IB guides